这是一篇关于和政府监管者谈判的小文，无奈自己英文水平有限，还望哪位好心的高手帮忙翻译一下，不胜感激！鞠躬！
Assume that rugulators have more discretion than they admit.Most regulators will insist they have no freedom to interpret prevailing guidelines.Even if they could use their discretion to solve a problem in a novel way,they're unlikely to do so for fear of being viewed as making subjective or personal judgments—their professional identities hinge on the presumption of objectivity.Yet rugulators actually do have a certain amount of discretion when it comes to interpreting guidelines,and they know that this discretion constitutes a source of power.Here are just a few of the types of judgment calls that regulators can make when processing your application.
*They can move quickly on an application or let it sit at the bottom of the stack.
*They can have a very experienced staff member handle your application or have a newcomer take care of it.
*They can make themselves available to you early in the process and alert you to mistakes,or they can meet only after you've submitted the application and reject it as containing incomplete data.
*They can share "model" applications that have won approval in the past or refrain from sharing such information.
*They can consider new independent scientific or technical studies on their merits or reject data from such studies on the grounds that their agency has not yet reviewed them.